True or False: You can use in between ratings if the rating falls between two labels.

Using in-between ratings is an essential part of providing nuanced evaluations in contexts where a rating might not neatly fit into predefined categories. When a rating falls between two labels, employing a scale that allows for fractional scores or nuanced judgments can lead to more accurate assessments. This is particularly relevant in scenarios where subjects are complex, and a simple binary or whole-number rating may not sufficiently capture the quality level being rated.

For instance, in a performance review scenario, if a product or service is rated as a 3 (acceptable) or a 4 (good), but its quality seems to hover between these two categories, indicating a '3.5' might be an appropriate reflection of its standing. This flexibility in rating enables raters to effectively communicate their assessments and ensures that the feedback is reflective of true value rather than forcing it into an artificial box.

In sum, the allowance for in-between ratings enriches the evaluation process, providing clarity and relevance to the ratings conveyed, leading to a more informed interpretation of the results.