What should a rater do when faced with unverifiable claims?

When faced with unverifiable claims, it is essential for a rater to mark the content as low-quality due to the lack of support. This is because claims that cannot be substantiated or verified may mislead users and contribute to the spread of misinformation. Raters are trained to assess the credibility and reliability of content, and unverifiable claims typically reflect poor content quality, warranting a lower rating.

By marking such content as low-quality, raters help ensure that users receive accurate and trustworthy information. A high-quality rating should be reserved for content that includes credible sources, factual accuracy, and a high level of reliability. The focus on supporting evidence is vital for maintaining the integrity of the information available to users.